Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Don't Hate On Your Poop, It'll Help Make Your Soup

With an ever-increasing population, it seems evident that manufacturers must find new and innovative methods of producing enough food to feed everyone. Farmers all over the world have begun to find new ways of fertilizing their crops in an effective and seemingly sustainable manner: biosolids. These biosolids are literally the byproducts of domestic and commercial sewage treatment. In other words, it is human waste that has been treated repeatedly to remove any toxins and pathogens, which is then used by farmers as fertilizer to grow crops which we will eventually consume, only to start the cycle all over again. Human waste is rich in phosphates which are vital to plant growth, and a Vancouver company is already developing a process by which the phosphates can be extracted, which could turn into an enormous industry in itself. But are biosolids really the best choice to address our needs? Could they be the fuel of the future? As we move towards new and sustainable resources, biosolids might be able to answer all our needs.


Although already treated, biosolids have been often seen to be breeding grounds for bacteria, pathogens and other contaminants that would be taken in by the plants which we would end up consuming. Biosolid treatment plants take great care in ensuring that contaminants are dealt with. The waste is pressurized, heated, and the pH is raised to kill off anything that would eventually be harmful to humans. Groundwater can also be permanently contaminated by leached biosolids. The main concerns about using biosolids as fertilizer are the harmful effects that they could have on our health and the environment. But biosolids have been used as fertilizers for many years now, and scientists cannot provide any evidence of sickness or health issues related to their use.


The positive effects of biosolid fertilization are quite evident in its sustainability. The source of the fertilizer comes from our waste, which would come from consumption of food. The energy continues to be used in a cycle and fuels the agricultural sector in a way that doesn’t use up many resources, but things that were already present and would have ended up in a landfill anyways. In a sense, by using the waste as fertilizer instead of allowing it to sit in a landfill and contribute to our large garbage output, it is a great eco-friendly solution to a large problem modern society has to deal with. And as more and more companies are developing methods to create fuels or sources of energy from biosolids, it seems apparent that they could be used as ways to greatly reduce the carbon footprint agriculture leaves on the environment.

Everything has its pros and cons, and it’s often seen that sacrifices must be made to take full advantage of the pros. The cons of biosolid fertilization are definitely issues that are cause for concern, but have been addressed in the way of sanitation and removal of pathogens. It seems quite evident that the use of biosolid as fertilization is a very good alternative to traditional fertilizers that end up with the same results. The effect biosolids have on the environment is very debateable, but the possibility of leaching into groundwater is also a problem of landfills. If care is taken to ensure the safety of the groundwater, biosolids are a great way to fertilize crops in an eco-friendly manner.


Even with all that biosolid fertilization can offer, people feel that it is disgusting since we eventually eat food that was previously grown in our waste. It’s easy to say the majority of North Americans consider our human waste as disgusting, but if it is contributing to a greater cause, what’s the difference? They’re not directly eating the biosolids, but plants that take the otherwise unused nutrients from our waste and flourish. Who’s to say that simply because it doesn’t conform to the views of society that we shouldn’t be attempting to move towards new innovation? Even at the moment, fertilizers being used right now can come from other waste sources simply because they actually help the growth of plants.


Biosolids, although technically the stuff that we don’t want anymore, seem to be an energy source of the future, being used for phosphates and other compounds, while being used as fertilizers of the present. There are some downsides, but it seems the eco-friendly sustainability of the process is proof that modern society is moving towards new and improved ways of doing things that need to be changed. Although it seems gross, biosolids are simply the first step on the path to a new, more sustainable tomorrow.

Sources:

The Beauty of Biosolids - Environmental Health Perspectives


Biosolids seen as a fertilizer alternative - Southeast Farm Press


Biosolids/Sewage Sludge - Greenworks

From toilet to table: biosolids for fertilizer - Sci Journer

Sewage Sludge, Pros and Cons - Mindfully.org


Commented On:
Kayla Villeda - "Biosolids Anyone?"

Denise Perez - "Next time, think before you flush."

5 comments:

  1. hey anthony

    this is weird; I'm the firt person to comment on your blog! lol
    I really liked your rhyming title I think it added some charm to this fece-tastic topic! The new way of extratcting phosphates sounds really cool. I agree that biosolids are an eco-friendly way of fertilizing agriculture. I mean, synthetic fertilizers don't really have the best effect on the environmet either; they too leach into water systems.

    The pathogens in biosolids are kind of freaky though; and there have been cases of handlers as well as people living near areas where biosolids have been applied that have health problems.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Anthony, really informative blog. I think that biosoilds might be the future for alternative sources of fuel. It's abundant and can never be exhausted. It'a already being used for fertilizer, why not try it in another field of use?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi, I truely agree that biosolids are truely organic and is eco-friendly. In my opinion, the negatives are just too great to use at this moment. I believe that scientists should add some ingredients to the biosolids in order to make it safe for sure. We never know the after effects of what we do. So, we have to always be careful and atleast try our best to take out the negative posibilities and tragedy.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Anthony, great bio-blog! I like your positive outlook for the future of biosolids. That's, interesting I didn't know that biosolids were also a possible energy source! There seems to be so man pros for biosolids, but I don't think you gave proper representation to the cons. Yes it's energy and eco-friendly, but it's not completely safe. We have only observed the short term effects of biosolids, but the longer term is yet to be observed. We can't go charging into new territory without properly knowing what we're dealing with. It seems you bring up grave points like the leeching of chemicals from biosolids into water, but then brush it off with it's eco-friendly. When safety and health are at stake, even though the pros seem to outweigh the cons, the risk is not one we can afford to take. We need to gather more intel on the effects of biosolids on the environment before we consider it a sustainable fertilizer.

    ReplyDelete
  5. lol hey Anthony, i totally agree with you that everything has pros and cons, biosolids are definitely eco- friendly and a positive out look for our environment right now. However knowing about the side effects that would later appear in our life worries me! scientist should discover more ways to create a even better eco-friendly fertilizer that would benefit to our health, they shouldn't just leave an incomplete experiment, especially since it may be harmful to our health.

    ReplyDelete